Is there are space for Google+ Hangouts in global development?
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
To be honest with you, I am still at a bit of loss when it comes to Google+ - especially in the context of international development communication, teaching etc. I am not an active member of Google+ so there may be a chance that I am missing out on a bunch of interesting discussions. But what I found quite interesting is that I have not come across any posts and videos that engage with Google+ Hangouts in the context of development (if there are examples, please send me links or comment below to put me out of my ignorance). The official Hangout videos on Google's YouTube channel have only received modest hits so far, e.g. this short introduction:
I do realise that cupcake baking looks more fun and is more active and interactive than, say, talking about land grabbing in Africa, but Google+ also promotes a more 'chatty' use of hangouts, e.g. during the upcoming Olympic Games:
Googles Hangout feature is once again giving Google+ users a chance to get closer to the stars, this time with a Olympic twist.
The New York Times-sponsored series started on Wednesday with
basketball stars Carmelo Anthony of the New York Knicks, and Chris Paul
of the Los Angeles Clippers. Both are members of the 2012 USA Basketball
team. The hangouts will run through next Tuesday.
Google Hangouts have been a favorite stop of politicians, celebrities, and friends. President Obama used the feature to connect with voters
back in January, and musical artists the Black Eyed Peas participated
in a hangout last October to chat with fans shortly before they took the
stage at a concert in New York City.
But with the Olympics coming up in short order, it makes sense for these hangouts to feature some of Americas top athletes, doesnt it?
So maybe there is an opportunity to create a Hangout with 'development celebrities' (no, I am not going to name names here and leave it to your imagination ;)...), academics or other personalities? I am also wondering whether there is a potential for teaching and training, e.g. creating a Hangout for an interactive workshop to introduce a technique, project, software etc?
Besides the fact that Google+ is not that widespread (yet?), what may be some of the issues why Hangouts have not been adopted by the development communication universe?
First, there are issues about accessibility, Internet connection speed and the challenge that global development takes place in different time-zones-so arranging a common Hangout time may be difficult. Second, not everything in development is as active as a Hans Rosling presentation...when it comes to spoken words, less interactive formats can still be very interesting, e.g. Owen Bader's Development Drums podcast or the Australia-based AidWorks radio programme. Third, linked to my first and second point, you often need time to digest interesting talks and critical new ideas and do so in your spare time, after work or 'later' when you can listen to your music player, read a transcript and stop a video whenever necessary.
But besides these caveats: Isn't there a space for Hangouts for conferences, presentations, work meetings and cost-effective training sessions? This is really an open-ended question and I am looking forward to your insights, examples and critical views before we can set up the first ever development 'Hangout-up' ;)!
Update 19 July:
Denise Brown, WFP Country Director in Niger, discusses the hunger crisis
unfolding across the Sahel region of Africa with a group of journalists
and bloggers from around the world. Participants include CNN Anchor Jim
Clancy, food security expert Roger Thurow, Reuters Alertnet George
Fominyen, UNHCR Spokesperson Fatoumata Lejeune-Kaba, ONE Campaign
agriculture specialist Kelly Hauser, advocate and blogger Jennifer
James, DSM Corporate Sustainability Director Fokko Wientjes, and WFP
Deputy Director of Communication Gregory Barrow.
Interesting example of using a Hang-Out: 'Come Hang Out and Talk Water Transparency' (http://www.aviewfromthecave.com/2012/08/come-hang-out-and-talk-water.html). Includes some technical comments by Tom Murphy and your truly.
After the Economist’s piece on the (non-)value of doing a PhD and some comments later (e.g. Prometheus doesn't read the Economist (I like the slightly cynical dichotomy between ‘civilians’ and the ‘academic insiders) or the ' 100 Reasons NOT to Go to Graduate School ' (they are only halfway through so check it out regularly in the future...) I had an interesting conversation with a prospective PhD student a few days ago. This was not the first time that I had been approached about doing a PhD and I always try to be as frank as possible, even playing the ‘devil’s advocate’ when it comes to the complicated ‘should I or shouldn’t I?’ decision-making process. At the end of our conversation I sat down and tried to summarize a few important and generic points from the point of view of doing a PhD in Development Studies and in the UK . I understand that every case is different and involves a range of motives, options and rationales, but there a few important questions and t
John Marsh just published an interesting article in the Chronicle of Higher Education on ' Why Education is not an Economic Panacea '. The article is long and a bit confusing to read. It is based on the author's experience in an education project for poor members of the community: The idea was simple. Faculty from the University of Illinois would offer night classes in their areas of expertise [...] for anyone in the community who was between the ages of 18 and 45 and lived at 150 percent of the poverty level of income or lower. [...] Students who completed the nine-month course would receive six hours of college credit, which they could then transfer to other institutions of higher learning. Everything would be free: tuition, books, even child care at a nearby community center. We named it after a similar program in Chicago, the Odyssey Project. In short, the programme was based on the well-known dicussion that education pays, and pays more than ever. If so, it
“ I feel good seeing myself dancing after receiving the money. It makes me appreciate the moment my life changed and reminds me of when I was able to send my son to school .” (Resident of Nakapiripirit, Uganda) “ It might seem strange to carp over a few good deeds filmed for YouTube clicks. After all, even if this Gen Z mode of philanthropy is brash and narcissistic, some lives are being changed for the better. Yet at the same time, Donaldson is exploiting less fortunate people’s problems to shape his image of decency, while reinforcing the aid illusion that has blown so much money and achieved so little over the past half century .” (Ian Birrell, UnHerd ) “ As people have noted, if you watch the video in total isolation, it's maybe not that bad? Mr Beast is good at this. And he's not obviously mocking or manipulating these people. Then again, the TV commentators in the Hunger Games fawned over Katniss. That wasn't the issue .” (Justin Sandefur, Center for Global Developmen
I am supposed to be on my summer blogging break , but the world of bad development does not seem to take a vacation... The first time I came across the #SWEDOW (Stuff We Don't Want) debate about what to do with unwanted stuff and whether to send it to 'Africa' was in 2010; in fact, I wrote about a shoe donation project on the blog in 2012. Fast forward to July 2019 and a local British Women's Institute Facebook page with about 500 page likes is posting a picture of two innocent-looking parcels that has been shared very widely. The vast majority of the 500+ comments under the post are positive and I am sure that both charities will receive quite a few parcels in the next few days. It seems almost futile and pointing out bad examples of charity and development is not always the best way to communicate, but I anonymize the post as much as possible to avoid simply shaming a particular Women's Institute chapter. 'Rapey men here are the same as rapey men t
Every two weeks I am going to feature one of the chapters of our Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality which was published in spring 2024. This week we are taking a closer look at Chapter 04 - Humanitarianism and the new wars: humanitarianism, security, and securitisation - contributed by Michael Magcamit and Anastassiya Mahon. From the introduction This chapter demonstrates and probes the idea of ‘humanitarian securitisation’ propelled by humanitarianism amidst the emergence of new wars linked to inequality. Humanitarian securitisation is defined here as the process of securitising the humanitarian crises brought about by the new wars – specifically, internal conflicts and terrorism – to justify the use and implementation of humanitarian intervention in the target states. As the foremost authority on ‘new wars’, Mary Kaldor ( 2016: 147 ), describes these phenomena as the ‘combination of political violence, organised crime and massive violations of human rights’ happening in di
Interesting example of using a Hang-Out:
ReplyDelete'Come Hang Out and Talk Water Transparency' (http://www.aviewfromthecave.com/2012/08/come-hang-out-and-talk-water.html). Includes some technical comments by Tom Murphy and your truly.