Salesforce's Marc Benioff has not kicked off a 'new era of corporate social activism'

I never planned this when I started my blog, but it is interesting how one of the themes that keeps (re-)emerging here is topic of how new forms of capitalism inform, interact with and inspire the aid industry. 

Some of my posts in the last few years addressed MBAs and their limited merit for development, how precarious labor spreads through a growing volunteering sector in EU countries as well as book reviews on philanthrocapitalism, social entrepreneurship or the self-help myth. Therefore, I was not surprised when the Wall Street Journal presented Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff as a 'trailblazer' for a new generation of companies and executives who are keen on combining people's needs with profits - Silicon Valley start-up-style...

As important as his initiative is to speak out against North Carolina's anti-LGBTQ law and announcing to move his business out of the state to a more liberal environment the debate reminds me a lot about discussions in 'our' industry on short-term approaches and long-term complexities.
It’s high risk for CEOs to show selective outrage against North Carolina...They will soon recognize the complexity of wading in too quickly into social issues where a great disconnect exists between the corporate suites and Main Street.
In a strange, twisted, development-related way, the NC Governor Pat McCrory has a point. Not on this particular issue of LGBTQ rights, of course, but about 'selective outrage' and issues where the corporate elites (not sure how many of them necessarily wear suits these days...) perceptions differ from actual complexities 'on the ground.

I wonder how the Salesforces of the world would speak out against gun violence, the military-industrial complex, abortion rights, the private prison industrial complex or inequality, say in specific sectors such as agriculture or health care.
And what about more complicated issues such as 'underdevelopment'?

When 'corporate social activism' is merely based on a elite consensus with the edginess of a TED talk
In short, Salesforce's Marc Benioff echoes an elite consensus ('gay rights are important') that comprises business elites, media, academia, pop-culture and substantial parts of the political establishment; even in a globalized world this consensus is firmly embedded in certain geographical locations, Silicon Valley, New York City or a few other global 'innovation' hotspots. This makes it easy for an outlet like the Wall Street Journal to celebrate his engagement and create a brilliant PR and communication win-win situation-everybody likes a billionaire who is rocking the boat ever so gently to remind us about his personal stature and the cutting-edge disruptive thinking that happens on those presumed 'margins' where he lives.

So how can (and want) CEOs set an agenda-especially if that agenda leads to more substantial backlash than comments from a peeved Republican Governor of a small state?

Moving an office, call center or any other movable part of the organization from one state to the next is one thing, but what it you speak out against surveillance and the Pentagon or other government agencies pull out their business?
If you are a cloud-based software company in this day and age chances are that both 'good' and 'bad' people are using your products and services. As with all CSR or similar window-dressing initiatives things usually change quickly when the 'bottom line' could be in danger and you need to defend your 'activism' against well-paid and well-oiled lobbying machines.
Marc Benioff presents his vision on the level of TED talks, of feel-good and feel-right criticism that numbs the oh-so-critical-and-expecting-more-from-life Generation Y without necessarily expanding the boundaries of social change.
I am also a bit afraid now that Benioff might discover 'Africa' in his next step and embark on a mission to 'eradicate poverty' through cloud-based software licenses...
 
As the company moves into its new 'Zen-Heavy, Eco-Groovy, Starchitect-Designed' building we are once again told a story we have heard quite often by now: How the Silicon Valley discourse can produce profits and a better world at the same time and how we are entering a 'new era' of philanthrocapitalism that balances people, planet and profits.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Global Development Substacks I Like

Image
The other day a friend asked me about recommendations for development-themed Substacks and rather than responding to him directly, I decided to share my favorite "blogs-send-out-as-newsletters" resources on the blog... For many years a group of German media entrepreneurs has been awarding the Goldenen Blogger and one category they had for many year was "bloggers without a blog"-this is a bit how I feel about Substack and the concept of (mostly) long newsletters instead of traditional blogs. So which are some of my favorite writers and concepts then? An Africanist Perspective Ken Opalo is a towering figure in the #globaldev Substack community-his posts, fully developed essays really, set the standard for long-form post-blogging... Disability Debrief I am so grateful to learn every week something new about (dis)ability & development thanks to Peter Torres Fremlin's newsletter! Suvojit's Newsletter "I currently live in Nairobi, and write regu...
Read more

Should I consider a PhD in International Development Studies?

After the Economist’s piece on the (non-)value of doing a PhD and some comments later (e.g. Prometheus doesn't read the Economist (I like the slightly cynical dichotomy between ‘civilians’ and the ‘academic insiders) or the ' 100 Reasons NOT to Go to Graduate School ' (they are only halfway through so check it out regularly in the future...) I had an interesting conversation with a prospective PhD student a few days ago. This was not the first time that I had been approached about doing a PhD and I always try to be as frank as possible, even playing the ‘devil’s advocate’ when it comes to the complicated ‘should I or shouldn’t I?’ decision-making process. At the end of our conversation I sat down and tried to summarize a few important and generic points from the point of view of doing a PhD in Development Studies and in the UK . I understand that every case is different and involves a range of motives, options and rationales, but there a few important questions and t...
Read more

Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality - Chapter 06 - Localisation and the humanitarian sector

Image
Every two weeks I am going to feature one of the chapters of our Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality which was published in spring 2024.  This week we are taking a closer look at Chapter 06 - Localisation and the humanitarian sector - contributed by Rita Stephan and Claudia E. Youakim From the introduction Over the past 15 years, the humanitarian crises have grown sixfold. Despite these alarming and swelling trends in humanitarian aid demand, a greater number of people who are affected by conflict and disaster ‘are unreached or underserved by the humanitarian sector’ ( Robillard et al., 2021 ; Girling and Urquhart, 2021 ). The humanitarian financing gap is growing whilethe availability of qualified and willing staff to meet the needs of people in crisis is becoming increasingly challenging ( UNHCR, 2016 ). Some observers suggest that one way to ‘fix’ the formal system is to improve donors’ effective engagement with local actors. Empowering local actors will not only addres...
Read more

What if MrBeast really is one of the futures of philanthropy-and what does that mean for communicating development?

Image
“ I feel good seeing myself dancing after receiving the money. It makes me appreciate the moment my life changed and reminds me of when I was able to send my son to school .” (Resident of Nakapiripirit, Uganda) “ It might seem strange to carp over a few good deeds filmed for YouTube clicks. After all, even if this Gen Z mode of philanthropy is brash and narcissistic, some lives are being changed for the better. Yet at the same time, Donaldson is exploiting less fortunate people’s problems to shape his image of decency, while reinforcing the aid illusion that has blown so much money and achieved so little over the past half century .” (Ian Birrell, UnHerd ) “ As people have noted, if you watch the video in total isolation, it's maybe not that bad? Mr Beast is good at this. And he's not obviously mocking or manipulating these people. Then again, the TV commentators in the Hunger Games fawned over Katniss. That wasn't the issue .” (Justin Sandefur, Center for Global Developmen...
Read more

Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality - Chapter 05 - Humanitarianism, development and peace: a southern perspective

Image
Every two weeks I am going to feature one of the chapters of our Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality which was published in spring 2024.  This week we are taking a closer look at Chapter 05 - Humanitarianism, development and peace: a southern perspective - contributed by Priya Singh and Paula Banerjee. From the introduction There has been a significant increase in emergencies caused by conflicts and deeply entrenched development issues over the last decade in many parts of the world, especially in the Global South. New conflicts, probability of renewed conflicts, failures of peace agreements, an alarming increase in global forced displacement with most refugees finding shelter in low-and middle-income states with shared borders, are added onto earlier rounds of humanitarian crises such as partitions of countries by colonial powers (e.g. Murshid, 2014 ) and multi-country wars. Added to these are crises related to climate change ( Jolly and Ahmad, 2019 ) and other ‘natural’ ...
Read more