Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality - Chapter 39 - Pracademvism – forever unequal or the new nexus in global development and humanitarianism

Every two weeks I am going to feature one of the chapters of our Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality which was published in spring 2024.
This week we are taking a closer look at Chapter 39 - Pracademvism – forever unequal or the new nexus in global development and humanitarianism - contributed by Themrise Khan. 

After almost two years, all 39 chapters of the handbook have been highlighted with their own short overview blog post, a great way to once again say Thank you to all the collaborators of the project!

From the introduction 

In the global development and humanitarian sector, however, academia is challenged by its sister concern, practitioner-based knowledge. Given that the sector relies heavily on the ‘practice’ of global development in order to create equality of rights and opportunities, academia can simply outline a framework for how such practice can unfold, not control the actual events or outcomes. This has created tensions between the two forms of knowledge specifically in this sector. But can the two work together to strengthen the pursuit of equality, or will they always be at cross-purposes? 
This chapter aims to explore these tensions by unpacking the respective perspectives that each brings. It also unveils a third link in the pursuit for knowledge – activism, now a key mechanism to create equality for global development. I term these three links as ‘pracademvism’ and attempt to explore how they can work together, as opposed to against each other while keeping the prime objective in focus – equality and human development. I begin with attempting to contextualise knowledge itself and our limited way of defining it. I follow this with unpacking each of the three forms of knowledge: academic, practitioner, and activist and the role that each plays in global development and humanitarianism, using my own personal experiences as a global development practitioner. The next section outlines how the three ‘spheres of influence’ as I call them, can work in tandem with each other to battle inequality. Finally, I envision how ‘pracademvism’ can operate in practice using a real-life example to illustrate. My conclusion states that it will be to our detriment if we continue to pit each against the other or exclude one from the other. Each brings a unique form of knowledge that is vital in creating an equitable world.

Note on contributor 

Themrise Khan is an independent development professional and researcher with over 25 years of practitioner and policy-based experience in international development. She has a number of publications and articles to her credit. She has just published a co-edited book, White Saviorism in International Development. Theories, Practices and Lived Experiences (Daraja Press, 2023). 
She blogs, speaks and writes on North–South power imbalances in development, race relations and immigrant citizenship and integration.

Overviews are already available for the following chapters: 
Introduction: humanitarianism and inequality – a re-orientation

Humanitarianism and colonialism

Humanitarianism and the global Cold War, 1945–1991

Humanitarianism and the new wars: humanitarianism, security, and securitisation

Humanitarianism, development and peace: a southern perspective

Localisation and the humanitarian sector

Human rights and humanitarianism

Humanitarian organisations: behemoths and butterflies

Faith actors in humanitarianism: dynamics and inequalities

Diaspora assistance

Political solidarity movements and humanitarianism: lessons from Catalonia, Spain (1975–2020)


Subversive humanitarianism

Citizen’s groups and grassroots humanitarianism

Humanitarianism and the military

Race, racialisation, and coloniality in the humanitarian aid sector

Humanitarian organisations as gendered organisations

Sexuality and humanitarianism: colonial ‘hauntings’

Class matters in humanitarianism

Humanitarianism and disability


Media representations of humanitarianism

Humanitarianism and pandemics

Humanitarian technologies

Linguistic inequality in the humanitarian sector: unravelling English-centric multilingualism

Climate change, disasters and humanitarian action

Refugee protection and assistance

Trafficking in persons, long-term vulnerabilities, and humanitarianism

Humanitarianism and Native America

Australia, New Zealand, and Pacific Regions


International humanitarianism in East Asia

West Asia and North Africa

Africa’s long fight for humanitarian self-sufficiency

The Latin American experience: inequality's role in shaping humanitarianism

Varieties of European humanitarianism

Humanitarian research ethics and the ethics of research in humanitarian settings

Archives and historical perspectives in researching humanitarianism

Quantitative Methods

Power dynamics in the use of qualitative methods in humanitarianism

Discussing inequalities in evaluation of humanitarian action 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should I consider a PhD in International Development Studies?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) & ChatGPT in development and humanitarian work-a curated collection

Who Owns England? (Book review)

Handbook on Humanitarianism and Inequality - Chapter 38 - Discussing inequalities in evaluation of humanitarian action

Dear white middle class British women: Please don't send used bras (or anything, really) to Africa